<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Editor\'s Edge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com</link>
	<description>Steve Piontek Editor-in-Chief</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:23:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Adieu, Part II by Joel Adelman</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/04/29/adieu-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Adelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=125#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Steven~
Best of good health and happiness in your retirement. I enjoyed your writings because you refused to be an Industry rubber stamp.
You provoked thought on important issues.
You wrote what you believed. 
More power to you !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven~<br />
Best of good health and happiness in your retirement. I enjoyed your writings because you refused to be an Industry rubber stamp.<br />
You provoked thought on important issues.<br />
You wrote what you believed.<br />
More power to you !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adieu, Part 1 by Charles  Wasilewski</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/04/15/adieu-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles  Wasilewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=123#comment-492</guid>
		<description>&quot;... this is a business riddled with contradictions. Its very basis is solemn promises and high aspirations, but the delivery on those noble ideals can run the gamut from total fulfillment to being very shabby indeed.&quot; 

That statement is as good and succinct a summary of the need for the insurance industry (and the need for the insurance trade media) as any I&#039;ve ever read.

Congratulations, Steve, on your retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; this is a business riddled with contradictions. Its very basis is solemn promises and high aspirations, but the delivery on those noble ideals can run the gamut from total fulfillment to being very shabby indeed.&#8221; </p>
<p>That statement is as good and succinct a summary of the need for the insurance industry (and the need for the insurance trade media) as any I&#8217;ve ever read.</p>
<p>Congratulations, Steve, on your retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adieu, Part 1 by Kurt</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/04/15/adieu-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=123#comment-481</guid>
		<description>I have enjoyed your editorials and will miss your decidedly liberal take on the industry and current events. 
Will you still be writing and/or blogging?
Best wishes,
Kurt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have enjoyed your editorials and will miss your decidedly liberal take on the industry and current events.<br />
Will you still be writing and/or blogging?<br />
Best wishes,<br />
Kurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adieu, Part 1 by jack mannion</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/04/15/adieu-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>jack mannion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=123#comment-478</guid>
		<description>steve, add my regrets to the others here about your departure. i always turned to your column upon the arrival of your magazine. your comments over the years have brightened my work week. having been a liberal all my life i found myself in agreement with almost every one of your editorials. good luck and god speed with your new career; you will be sorely missed by many of us   jack mannion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steve, add my regrets to the others here about your departure. i always turned to your column upon the arrival of your magazine. your comments over the years have brightened my work week. having been a liberal all my life i found myself in agreement with almost every one of your editorials. good luck and god speed with your new career; you will be sorely missed by many of us   jack mannion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adieu, Part 1 by Gary Duell</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/04/15/adieu-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Duell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=123#comment-477</guid>
		<description>And a &quot;here, here&quot; to John &amp; Kate.  It seems to be difficult in this industry to find writers capable of forming their own thoughts.  You&#039;re one of them Steve.  Best of luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a &#8220;here, here&#8221; to John &amp; Kate.  It seems to be difficult in this industry to find writers capable of forming their own thoughts.  You&#8217;re one of them Steve.  Best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adieu, Part 1 by John</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/04/15/adieu-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=123#comment-458</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Steve,

We desperately need people in this industry with the guts and leadership to stake out a position and argue it seriously.  So much of the talk is disingenuous pablum sanitized for general consumption... your writing has cut to the chase and cleared away the BS.

I agree with Kate - you&#039;ll be terribly missed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Steve,</p>
<p>We desperately need people in this industry with the guts and leadership to stake out a position and argue it seriously.  So much of the talk is disingenuous pablum sanitized for general consumption&#8230; your writing has cut to the chase and cleared away the BS.</p>
<p>I agree with Kate &#8211; you&#8217;ll be terribly missed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adieu, Part 1 by Kate</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/04/15/adieu-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=123#comment-451</guid>
		<description>This is terrible news, gotta say. You are one of those voices in the wilderness whose views may not always please everyone in your audience, but who offers a healthy and refreshing perspective that everyone in your audience ought to hear amid the myriad controversies that seem to dominate not just our industry but financial services in general.

Thank you for sticking to your guns, Steve! I can confidently say that you will be terribly missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is terrible news, gotta say. You are one of those voices in the wilderness whose views may not always please everyone in your audience, but who offers a healthy and refreshing perspective that everyone in your audience ought to hear amid the myriad controversies that seem to dominate not just our industry but financial services in general.</p>
<p>Thank you for sticking to your guns, Steve! I can confidently say that you will be terribly missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pre-existing Conditions by Michael Lutsch</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/04/01/pre-existing-conditions/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lutsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=121#comment-435</guid>
		<description>What about the &quot;x %&quot;  of those children covered by insurance whose parents pay rated premiums, either for their coverage or for their children?  Are these also to be re-rated to lower premiums?  And who ends up paying the additional claims?
The for-profit CEO&#039;s may have to inform their shareholders of anticipated lower earnings due to increased claim frequency and severity.   
For the next few years this approach can &quot;work&quot; because we can foist the cost of the children upon the parents.  
Your concern seems a little like the business that only loses a little on each sale but makes us the loss thru volume.  
ml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the &#8220;x %&#8221;  of those children covered by insurance whose parents pay rated premiums, either for their coverage or for their children?  Are these also to be re-rated to lower premiums?  And who ends up paying the additional claims?<br />
The for-profit CEO&#8217;s may have to inform their shareholders of anticipated lower earnings due to increased claim frequency and severity.<br />
For the next few years this approach can &#8220;work&#8221; because we can foist the cost of the children upon the parents.<br />
Your concern seems a little like the business that only loses a little on each sale but makes us the loss thru volume.<br />
ml</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yes! by Tony</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/03/22/yes/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=119#comment-410</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like an honest answer. Why should I be happy about this bill passing?

I own a small business - an insurance agency, in fact, which is how I wound up reading this posting. I&#039;m 45, married, and have three children. I have a high-deductible HSA compatible individual health policy which costs me about $6,000 a year.

Now that Obamacare is the law, my HSA compatible policy will no longer be offered, as the benefits aren&#039;t &quot;rich&quot; enough to satisfy the IRS. I will then have to buy a comprehensive major medical policy which the Congressional Budget Office estimates will cost me between $12,000 and $15,000 per year, and the IRS will check my bank account monthly to ensure that I have purchased such a policy. I&#039;m unlikely to be eligible for any subsidies to purchase my coverage, so that additional cost will come out of my slim profit margin.

Of course, I could simply drop my insurance coverage and pay a fine, and then wait to buy coverage until I&#039;m sick or injured. From what I know about insurance underwriting and pricing, my health carrier won&#039;t be in business for long if everyone did that, and I suspect many will.

This is the same scenario facing millions of small businesses in this country, those responsible for employing 70% to 80% of workers. What do you suppose will happen to the unemployment rate when they realize that they must fire some of their employees in order to remain viable? Not even this administration can expand the government workforce fast enough to absorb them all.

Again - why are we celebrating?


Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like an honest answer. Why should I be happy about this bill passing?</p>
<p>I own a small business &#8211; an insurance agency, in fact, which is how I wound up reading this posting. I&#8217;m 45, married, and have three children. I have a high-deductible HSA compatible individual health policy which costs me about $6,000 a year.</p>
<p>Now that Obamacare is the law, my HSA compatible policy will no longer be offered, as the benefits aren&#8217;t &#8220;rich&#8221; enough to satisfy the IRS. I will then have to buy a comprehensive major medical policy which the Congressional Budget Office estimates will cost me between $12,000 and $15,000 per year, and the IRS will check my bank account monthly to ensure that I have purchased such a policy. I&#8217;m unlikely to be eligible for any subsidies to purchase my coverage, so that additional cost will come out of my slim profit margin.</p>
<p>Of course, I could simply drop my insurance coverage and pay a fine, and then wait to buy coverage until I&#8217;m sick or injured. From what I know about insurance underwriting and pricing, my health carrier won&#8217;t be in business for long if everyone did that, and I suspect many will.</p>
<p>This is the same scenario facing millions of small businesses in this country, those responsible for employing 70% to 80% of workers. What do you suppose will happen to the unemployment rate when they realize that they must fire some of their employees in order to remain viable? Not even this administration can expand the government workforce fast enough to absorb them all.</p>
<p>Again &#8211; why are we celebrating?</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yes! by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/2010/03/22/yes/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeandhealtheditor.com/?p=119#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Gary - Another strawman. I did a search on this thread and it appears you were the first one to mention Rush or Beck, so exactly what point are you trying to make? 

Is it that if anyone disagrees with this law, it automatically follows that we &quot;must&quot; be blindly following some pundit that you dislike? I think you might consider taking your own advice &quot;as you mature&quot;. 

I took a quick look at your blog and you say some things I can agree with, but many are hardly &quot;genuine facts&quot;, but merely your opinions. I have no doubt that you are sincere and well-meaning in your opinions, but so am I. And IN MY OPINION, regardless of well-meaning you and others are, you are sadly very wrong about what will and won&#039;t work in HCR on many issues. You see, I have no doubt that much of the law is written with &quot;good intentions&quot; and you describe the &quot;good intentions&quot; as if they are facts. But if you really understood how insurance (and government) works, you would begin to understand that there will likely be &quot;unintended consequences&quot; of such &quot;good intentions&quot;. I have my own educational and professional credentials and experience that I think qualifies me to have (my own) opinions without being lectured about where you somehow think my opinions must come from.

But if you want to jump to conclusion like that instead of taking the risk that we could all learn from some honest debate, then I might have to guess that you get your Kool-Aid from your own set of pundits.

Chuck

And I have no reason to believe that Steve does not in fact rock, but I just have not seen him at a dance. I definitely do not rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary &#8211; Another strawman. I did a search on this thread and it appears you were the first one to mention Rush or Beck, so exactly what point are you trying to make? </p>
<p>Is it that if anyone disagrees with this law, it automatically follows that we &#8220;must&#8221; be blindly following some pundit that you dislike? I think you might consider taking your own advice &#8220;as you mature&#8221;. </p>
<p>I took a quick look at your blog and you say some things I can agree with, but many are hardly &#8220;genuine facts&#8221;, but merely your opinions. I have no doubt that you are sincere and well-meaning in your opinions, but so am I. And IN MY OPINION, regardless of well-meaning you and others are, you are sadly very wrong about what will and won&#8217;t work in HCR on many issues. You see, I have no doubt that much of the law is written with &#8220;good intentions&#8221; and you describe the &#8220;good intentions&#8221; as if they are facts. But if you really understood how insurance (and government) works, you would begin to understand that there will likely be &#8220;unintended consequences&#8221; of such &#8220;good intentions&#8221;. I have my own educational and professional credentials and experience that I think qualifies me to have (my own) opinions without being lectured about where you somehow think my opinions must come from.</p>
<p>But if you want to jump to conclusion like that instead of taking the risk that we could all learn from some honest debate, then I might have to guess that you get your Kool-Aid from your own set of pundits.</p>
<p>Chuck</p>
<p>And I have no reason to believe that Steve does not in fact rock, but I just have not seen him at a dance. I definitely do not rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
